Saturday, October 11, 2008

Taiko






"Taiko"


in general is often used to mean the relatively modern art of Japanese drum ensembles (kumi-daiko), but the word actually refers to the taiko drums themselves. Literally, taiko means "fat drum," although there is a vast array of shapes and sizes of taiko. Within the last fifty years since kumi-daiko was created, it has seen phenomenal growth to the point where there are over 8,000 taiko groups in Japan by some counts. Borrowing on thousands of years of tradition, taiko groups are now taking the style worldwide. Taiko promises to be the first native Japanese music to spread through the world.
People are sometimes confused by the frequent usage of the word "daiko", which is a suffix used to indicate a type of drum, a taiko group, or a style of taiko playing, in a compound word. When used in a compound word, the "T" sound in "taiko" changes to a "D" sound. Thus, a taiko group from Edo would be called "Edo-daiko", for example.



Taiko in Japanese History



The exact history of Japanese Taiko remains shrouded in speculation, although some educated guesses are possible. The oldest physical evidence of taiko in Japan is a haniwa clay figure of a drummer that dates from the sixth or seventh century. However,since the first instruments in any society tend to be percussion instruments, it would not be out of the question for taiko (as we know them today) to have been used in Japan for well over 2000 years.
Japanese taiko as we know them today bear strong resemblance to Chinese and Korean instruments, which were probably introduced in the waves of Korean and Chinese cultural influence from 300-900 AD. It has been speculated that the predecessor of the tsuzumi style of taiko may come from as far as India, and came to Japan along with Buddhism. However, the waves of cultural influence stopped for the most part around the year 900, and development from that point can basically be attributed to native Japanese craftsmen. Taiko, although continuing to bear similarities to Chinese and Korean drums, have evolved into unique Japanese instruments.
Reputedly, one of the first uses of taiko was as a battlefield instrument; used to intimidate and scare the enemy - a use to which drums have been put in many cultures. Taiko were definitely used in battle to issue commands and coordinate movements by the 1500's; the taiko being the only instrument that could be heard across the entire battlefield. According to picture scrolls and painted screens of the time, one soldier would carry the taiko lashed to a backpack-like frame, while two other soldiers would beat the taiko, on each side. Both nagado and okedo style taiko were used in this capacity. A war taiko used by Shingen Takeda, a famous warlord of that era, still exists and is preserved by Osuwa-daiko. It is remarkable for the three large holes cut in the side of the nagado style taiko. This served to increase the volume of the drum, useful in battle.
In addition to the martial aspect, taiko have always been used in the most refined cultural settings as well. Gagaku music was introduced to Japan in the Nara periord (697-794) along with Buddhism, and was quickly adopted as the imperial court music. Gagaku is the oldest continually played court music in the world, and it is still being performed. The taiko used for Gagaku (kakko, san-no-tsuzumi, dadaiko, tsuri-daiko, ninai-daiko, ikko, furitsuzumi, kaiko) are some of the most elegant and beautifully decorated of all Japanese instruments.
The rumbling power of the taiko has also been long been associated with the gods, and has been appropriated by the religions of Japan. According to Daihachi Oguchi of Osuwa-daiko, about four thousand years ago, in the Jomon period , taiko was used for to signal various activities in the village. Simple taiko beats would be used to signal that the hunters were setting out, or to signal that a storm was coming and that the women needed to bring in the meat and fruits they had drying. While there is no direct physical evidence to support this claim, Megumi Ochi, curator of the Taiko Kan Museum, believes this to be true since other cultures exhibit the same behavior. Because these signals were so important to the flow of daily life, the people were very thankful of the taiko, and began to believe that the taiko was inhabited by a god.
As this belief developed, only the holy men were allowed to beat the taiko, and as the Shinto and Buddhist religions developed in Japan, this custom remained. Thus the only instruments to be found in Shrines and Temples were taiko. One consequence of this association of taiko with religion was that taiko were played only on special occasions, and only by men who were granted special permission by the priests. All through this time, taiko were played singly, or in certain instances in pairs. Taiko ensembles were only developed much later.
Taiko has continued to find a place in religious ceremonies, both Buddhist and Shinto, and it is extremely common to find taiko in both temples and shrines. In fact, the Nichiren sect is credited with created the uchiwa style taiko, who used it as an aid in chanting. Some Buddhist sects use taiko to represent the voice of Buddhah, and Bon dancing in summer is centered around Buddhist rites. It was used in village Shinto rites to offer up prayers to the Gods. In addition, the village festivals were celebrated with the sound of drumming. These festivals developed a rich body of traditional taiko rhythms which are a now a never ending source of inspiration to modern players.
Modern Taiko History
Taiko as it is performed today, as an ensemble (kumi-daiko), is a post war phenomenon which was born in Showa 26 (1951). Daihachi Oguchi, who created the kumi-daiko style, is given much of the credit for the current taiko boom. Oguchi was a jazz drummer, who happened upon a old piece of taiko music. Deciding to perform the old music for the Osuwa shrine, Oguchi "jazzed it up" as he arranged it. Coming from a jazz background, he wondered why taiko were never played together, and broke with tradition by assembling a taiko drum ensemble.
By taking taiko of various sizes, Oguchi assembled a variety of musical voices which he quickly assigned roles in his arrangements. The high pitched shime-daiko carried the ji (backing rhythm). The Odaiko played a simple rhythm that firmly grounded the pulse. A variety of nagado-daiko each had propulsive riffs that pushed the music along. Topping this off was the metallic sound of the tetsu-zutsu (often called a canon in English), a bell like instrument consisting of three pieces of pipe of differing diameters welded together. Since many of his performers were not professional musicians, he also divided the rhythms into easier to play parts. In addition, each performer played on several taiko, set up in the fashion of a jazz drumset. Oguchi went on to lead the influential Osuwa Daiko, and spread his exciting taiko style throughout Japan, and then throughout the world.
This dynamic and propulsive kumi-daiko style was an instant hit, and many groups were formed in the Hokuriku region of Japan. Groups would often play at hot springs for the entertainment of the guests. By 1957 the Hokuriku Odaiko Enthusiasts Association was formed, and the Hokuriku Taiko Association was founded the following year. The advent of Japanese television brought exposure and more popularity to the style.



Another taiko pioneer was

Sukeroku Daiko, whose playing style was based on Edo-bayshi rhythms. In 1959, a group called Yushima Tenjin Sukeroku Daiko was founded under the auspices of the Yushima Tenjin shrine. The four founding members were Yoshihisa Ishikura , Yutaka Ishizuka (who received the stage name Saburo Mochizuki), Seido Kobayashi, and Motoei Onozato (who received the stage name Kiyonari Tosha). Sukeroku Daiko created a dynamic performing style emphasizing speed, fluidity and power that is highly emulated. They also brought a strong sense of choreography and flashy solos to the growing taiko movement. A scism eventually sent the founder their separate ways. At some point, a schism split the group up. Imaizumi-sensei maintained the Yushima Tenjin Sukeroku Daiko group and is still active. Seido Kobayashi went on to found Oedo Sukeroku Daiko, which is credited with being the first professional taiko group.


Taiko got a boost in the 1970's when the Japanese Government authorized funds to help preserve the intangible cultural assets that were slowly vanishing in the post-war era. Many local communities used some of the monies they received to start community taiko groups. Some of these groups used the local taiko rhythms used in festivals, others went to well known groups and had music written for them. The end result is that it is estimated that there are over 4,000 taiko groups in Japan. Some are local hozonkai (preservation societies) that just drum for the local festivals, but a hand full of others have gone on to international acclaim.



In 1969 Tagayasu Den founded Za Ondekoza on Sado Island in Japan. Collecting a group of dedicated youths disaffected with modern big city life, he created a new kind of taiko group totally dedicated to taiko drumming as a way of life. Rigorous training, including daily marathon running, and communal living forged powerful taiko performances that have awed the world. Za Ondekoza is credited with bringing taiko to audiences worldwide. The original members of Za Ondekoza went on to form Kodo in 1981 after splitting with Den, who started a new Za Ondekoza. Kodo has gone on to international fame, becoming perhaps the best know taiko group outside of Japan.



With the success of internationally touring taiko groups like Kodo and Ondekoza, Taiko groups have been started in many other countries as well, notably the U.S. and Canada, although groups exists throughout Europe, Australia, and South America as well. Currently taiko is enjoying a boom in popularity worldwide, but especially in North America, where there are around 150 taiko groups. Given that most groups do not receive any support, and that most must make their own drums out of wine barrels, the growth of North American Taiko has been phenomenal.



Taiko in North America



As Japanese immigrated to North America in the early part of the 1900's, they brought taiko over with them as well. Taiko in North America previous to 1968 were primarily used as Miya-daiko (temple drums) and in various dojo (kendo, judo, karate). Also Japanese immigration brought variations of minyo-daiko (folk taiko) - specifically Fukushima Ondo (Som-a Bon Uta) groups - to accompany other art forms. Taiko drumming for Bon Odori was established in Hawaii as early as 1910, and the Kanazawa Kenjinkai brought taiko to San Francisco as early as the 1930's. So the tradition use of taiko drums was well established in Japanese-American communities in North America until World War II. The war, and the subsequent incarceration of hundreds of thousand so Japanese and Japanese-Americans as "enemy aliens" brought Japanese culture in the US to a abrupt halt. Once the war was over, many Japanese tried very hard to assimilate into US culture, and many of the following generation lost much of the language and culture. but the it wasn't until 1968 that Seiichi Tanaka brought the exciting kumi-daiko style to the States.



In 1968, Seiichi Tanaka formed the first North American taiko group, the San Francisco Taiko Dojo. Tanaka eventually went on to form the "Tanaka style" which is a synthesis of Oedo Sukeroku, Osuwa Daiko and Gojinjyo-daiko styles. He and his group went on to inspire many, if not most, of the taiko groups throughout American and Canada. The vast majority of taiko groups in North America owe a huge stylistic debt to Oedo Sukeroku as interpreted by the San Francisco Taiko Dojo. Kinnara Taiko of Los Angeles was founded the following year, in 1969, creating a uniquely American hybrid - Japanese American Buddhist taiko. San Jose Taiko followed in 1973, focusing on making taiko a Japanese American art form. San Francisco Taiko Dojo and San Jose Taiko have gone on to turn professional, and both groups have returned the favor by touring Japan.



Taiko, although utilizing ancient instruments, has been infused with a thoroughly modern spirit, and has continued to grow in popularity throughout the world.

Friday, October 10, 2008

For the few that can relate



"We Didn't Start The Fire" Billy Joel

Harry Truman, Doris Day, Red China, Johnnie RaySouth Pacific, Walter Winchell, Joe DiMaggio Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Studebaker, televisionNorth Korea, South Korea, Marilyn Monroe Rosenberg's, H-Bomb, Sugar Ray, PanmunjomBrando, "The King and I", and "The Catcher in the Rye" Eisenhower, vaccine, England's got a new queen Marciano, Liberace, Santayana goodbye

CHORUS

We didn't start the fire It was always burning Since the world's been turning We didn't start the fire No we didn't light it But we tried to fight it

Josef Stalin, Malenkov, Nasser and ProkofievRockefeller, Campanella, Communist BlocRoy Cohn, Juan Peron, Toscanini, dacron Dien Bien Phu and "Rock Around the Clock" Einstein, James Dean, Brooklyn's got a winning team Davy Crockett, "Peter Pan", Elvis Presley, Disneyland Bardot, Budapest, Alabama, KhrushchevPrincess Grace, "Peyton Place", trouble in the Suez

CHORUS

We didn't start the fire It was always burning Since the world's been turning We didn't start the fire No we didn't light it But we tried to fight it

Little Rock, Pasternak, Mickey Mantle, KerouacSputnik, Chou En-Lai, "Bridge on the River Kwai"Lebanon, Charles de Gaulle, California baseball Stark weather, homicide, children of thalidomideBuddy Holly, "Ben-Hur", space monkey, Mafiahula hoops, Castro, Edsel is a no goU2, Syngman Rhee, payola and KennedyChubby Checker, "Psycho", Belgians in the Congo

CHORUS

We didn't start the fireIt was always burning Since the world's been turning We didn't start the fire No we didn't light it But we tried to fight it

Hemingway, Eichmann, "Stranger in a Strange Land" Dylan, Berlin, Bay of Pigs Invasion "Lawrence of Arabia", British BeatlemaniaOle Miss, John Glenn, Liston beats PattersonPope Paul, Malcolm X, British politician sex JFK, blown away, what else do I have to say

CHORUS

We didn't start the fire It was always burning Since the world's been turning We didn't start the fire No we didn't light it But we tried to fight it

Birth control, Ho Chi Minh, Richard Nixon, back again Moonshot, Woodstock, Watergate, punk rock Begin, Reagan, Palestine, terror on the airlineAyatollolah's in Iran, Russians in Afghanistan"Wheel of Fortune" , Sally Ride, heavy metal, suicide Foreign debts, homeless vets, AIDS, Crack, Bernie Goetz Hypodermics on the shore, China's under martial lawRock and Roller Cola Wars, I can't take it anymore

CHORUS

We didn't start the fire But when we are gone Will it still burn on, and on, and on, and on


You are in control

Karare Philosophy
All people are either winners, losers or a mixture of both. But everybody can be a winner if he or she really wants to be. the first principle to appreciate is that winning is a goal. One thing is certain, winners always have a specific goal for which they are striving. To them, winning is the ability to embrace a worthwhile goal and then employ all of their powers for the achievement of that goal. So, if you want to be a winner, have a specific goal for your life. What do you really want to achieve with your life? Be honest. Make that your goal. Write it down, giving yourself a reasonable time to reach it. Go over your goal every day. Visualize it as having already been reached. Close your eyes and picture it done. This will help get your goal deep into your subconscious mind, where you will unlock the incredible resources of your inner self to help you achieve that on which you have set your heart. " If you believe in yourself – that you can win – you can. If you don't, you can't. " Second, winning is a philosophy, and your philosophy, simply put, is your system of beliefs. Among other things, you need to believe in yourself as well as your cause. If you believe in yourself—that you can win—you can. If you don't, you can't. As one person put it, "To be ambitious for wealth, and yet always expecting to be poor; to be always doubting your ability to get what you long for is like trying to reach east by traveling west. There is no philosophy which will help a man succeed when he is always doubting his ability to do so, and thus attracting failure. No matter how hard you work for success, if your thought is saturated with fear of failure, it will kill your efforts, neutralize your endeavors, and make success impossible. You also need to believe in your cause. If you don't, nobody else will either. Third, winning is an attitude, your attitude being how you feel about what you believe in. This provides motivation. "Winners are not afraid to go after what they want, but they do so in appropriate ways. Winners do not get their security by controlling others. They do not set themselves up to lose. "Winners throw off unrealistic self-images of inferiority or superiority. "Winners may lose ground occasionally and may even fail. Yet, in spite of setbacks, winners maintain a basic self-confidence. For them achievement is not the most important thing. Authenticity is." In other words, being real is winning. When people are real—that is, honest with themselves and see their true potential as well as their weaknesses—they can be freed to achieve their goals for the right purpose. Instead of being driven by false motives and unconscious needs, they can take control of their lives and destinies. Regardless of backgrounds, full responsibility can be taken for who they become and what they do. That is what makes each person a winner. Winners know and resolve their past. They live in the present. They plan for the future. And regardless of failures, they always get up, start again, and never give up. Finally, winning is a way of life—a way of life that calls for action. It is what you do about achieving your goals. "Winners don't watch things happen. They make them happen. " The point is, "Quitters never win and winners never quit." Winners don't watch things happen. They make them happen. So, if you want to be a winner, begin today by writing down your goals. Then start working towards their fulfillment immediately. Beginning is the hard part. But once you've begun, you're already half done. Then work towards achieving your goals just one step at a time. As it has been said before, "Inch by inch anything's a cinch—but yard by yard it's miles too hard!" ......

Our Mission


Mission Statement
This organization is dedicated to personal development. Through Karate-Do we develop the heart, mind and body of our students and of ourselves. Our goal is to maintain a positive environment where everyone affiliated with this organization feels good about themselves.
Throughout training, students and Senseis are encouraged to be their personal best. This mission will be accomplished through a cooperative effort of constant education and support.
Our instructors are dedicated to uphold the highest level of integrity and to lead by example both in and out of the dojo.
We share a long term common vision to support our community and our dojo family through unconditional commitment. We will be uncompromising in our efforts and innovative in our pursuit of excellence.

Practice


In our Karate practice we daily explore our true nature, strengths, and weaknesses. the book

“If you know yourself and know others you will be successful,
If you know others and not yourself you will win one and lose one,
If you do not know others and do not know yourself you are destined for failure in every battle.”

Sun Tzu

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Leadreship


A leader is best when people barely know he exists, not so good when people obey and acclaim him, worse when they despise him. But of a good leader who talks little when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say, we did it ourselves.
Lao Tzu

Education


What is a karate style? How does one style differ from another? How have particular styles developed over time? What makes a style traditional? Why have different versions of the same traditional kata developed? What is the best style of karate? What is the difference between orthodox and traditional styles of karate?

There are many, widely-varying answers an experienced Karate practitioner can supply to the above questions. We can talk on history, philosophy, culture, technique, purpose, physical structure, geography, politics, etc. We can address the evolution of Karate form its early Chinese roots, to its birth in Okinawa and its introduction to Japan and the rest of the world. We can discuss the differences between Karate-Jitsu and Karate-Do, and their impact on style development. The advantages and disadvantages of the various styles can be discussed. The list can go on and on!!
One of the first points to be addressed is what is meant by the word "traditional". The Webster Dictionary defines traditional as ..."the transmission of information, beliefs, customs, etc., from ancestors to posterity ... also a belief, practice, etc., so transmitted, ... something handed down from the past; an inherited culture, attitude, etc." In the Karate-do arts today, when we talk of traditional styles, we refer to the modern day styles of karate which began to appear around eighty years ago, and are very important from an historical viewpoint. The earlier styles from which the "traditional" styles evolved are generally referred to as the "Orthodox" styles.
The orthodox styles include:
Shuri-te, Naha-te and Tomari-te.
The Orthodox styles had their birth in the earlier art of "Te" which was what the Art of Karate was called in its earliest stages. Another word which cane into use a little time later was "Tode". Both of these names were used to describe the method of self-defense used by the Okinawans. Over the years, the development of Te focused upon three geographical areas of the island. These were the villages of Shuri, Naha and Tomari. Although all three of these areas are located in the southern portion of the Island, each had some unique qualities which resulted in the development of different styles of self-defense. The Village of Shuri was the home of the King and the Noble families. Naha Village served as the major commercial center, while Tomari Village was primarily a farming and fishing community.
Prior to discussing the traditional styles of karate, it is necessary to first look at the katas found within the early Orthodox styles of the old Okinawan Karate (Te) to get a better picture of the evolution of the later traditional styles. The early katas found within the Shuri-te, Naha-te and Tomari-te Orthodox styles are presented below:
Most of the traditional styles of karate known throughout the world today trace their lineage to one or more of these earlier orthodox systems of Okinawan Karate. The one major exception to this point is the lineage of the Uechi-ryu Style which developed basically independently from its earlier roots in China.
Prior to taking a detailed look at the katas comprising the various traditional styles of Karate-do practiced today, the following points must be raised to eliminate any confusion when comparing katas found within the various Japanese and Okinawan styles. First, almost all Japanese styles of modern day Karate-do evolved from the late Master Gichin Funakoshi's "Shotokan" style introduced to Japan in the early 1920's. Secondly, the katas of the Shotokan system were altered versions of the original Okinawan katas. The alterations included: pattern changes, technique/stance modifications, spelling/pronunciation changes to the kata names, and changes in the order of some of the katas. The spelling/pronunciation changes were in many cases a function of the language differences between China, Okinawa and Japan. As an example, the Kanji for the Okinawan kata "Pinan" would be read as "Chinan" in Chinese, and "Heian" by the Japanese. Other name changes resulted from different translations of the kata name or a complete change in the name to make it more acceptable to the Japanese. A comparison between the names of the katas of the current Japanese styles and their earlier Okinawan counterparts is presented below.
Trying to place exact dates on when the various traditional styles of karate started is hard to do as many times the style names may have not been made public. However, from a general historical viewpoint, most of todays popular traditional styles were founded/named during the period 1930's to 1960's. Prior to this period, the karate-kas generally referred to their art as "Okinawa-te" or more specifically as "Shuri-te", "Naha-te" or "Tomari-te". The naming of todays styles was an end result of many factors, the most significant being the increased popularization of the art which resulted in increased pressure for standardization and thus "name giving" to distinguish one Master's teachings from another.
The key factors resulting in the increased popularity of karate in Okinawa was its introduction into the public school system. Prior to this time most of the early karate instructors limited their teaching to a small handful of students. The individual generally considered responsible for the introduction of karate into the school system was Yatsune Itosu (1830-1915) in the early 1900's. Itosu at this time was already well along in years and as a result he was assisted in the teaching by his two senior students: Kentsu Yabu (1863-1937) and Chomo Hanashiro (1869-1945). With the expansion of karate in the school system, the art became exposed to a larger portion of the general population. With more and more people practicing the art, the various public schools started to take on a major role in the evolution of Karate. Over time each of the schools tended to become associated with a particular teacher and or "style". The introduction of the Okinawan Art of Karate to Japan in the period 1915 to the early 1920's, by Gichin Funakoshi (1869-1957) and Okinawan Kobudo by Shinko Matayoshi (1888-1947) resulted in a situation which tended to parallel karate's growth in Okinawa.
In Japan like Okinawa, Karate was popularized primarily through its introduction into the educational system of the country. However, in Japan the difference was its introduction into the College system. Jigoro Kano (founder of Judo) was helpful to Funakoshi in paving karate's way into the University system. Building on the Japanese peoples interest in a wide variety of Martial Arts, Funakoshi and his subsequent senior students established Karate Clubs at most of the major universities in Japan. This introduction of Karate at the College level would later give birth to the development of sparring competition between schools which preceded the introduction of karate tournaments in the early 1960's.
Today we can divide both the Okinawan and Japanese styles into four major and a number of minor styles. A sample listing of the major and minor styles are presented below:
It should be noted that the establishment of a new style in the past was quite unlike what we see all too often today, where it seems new style after new style is founded by individuals who after earning their Shodan or Nidan in "record time", go on to start their own "improved style". In the past the typical Okinawan or Japanese individual studied under a Master(s) for an extended period of time and received their Teachers License (Renshi) or Senior Teachers License (Kyoshi) prior to founding their own style, if ever at all. their style was generally a "Kan" or version of their teacher's style - "Ryu".
A good example of this "Ryu / Kan" structure utilized in the traditional Okinawan and Japanese arts is found by examining the Shorin-ryu system with its numerous Kans (styles).
RYU (SYSTEM)
o SHORIN-RYU
KAN (STYLE)
o Shorin-ryu Kobayashio Shorin-ryu Matsubashio Shorin-ryu Sukunaihayashio Shorin-ryu Matsumura Orthodoxo Shorin-ryu Seidokano Shorin-ryu Seibukano Shorin-ryu Kenshinkano Cubushorin-ryuo Nanbushorin-ryu
Although the katas included in each of the Shorin-ryu styles vary, the modern day Shorin-ryu styles trace their lineage to the earlier Shuri-te and Tomari-te orthodox styles primarily.
As noted earlier, it is impossible to look at the evolution of the traditional styles of Karate without considering their katas. One obvious question that arises is - Why do differences exist in similar katas taught in the various traditional karate styles? Additionally even greater confusion arises when one realizes that many of the styles trace their lineage to the same teacher or teachers!! How then did the differences in kata occur when each teacher / style claims to be traditional?
There are a number of answers or reasons for this situation. First, it must be recognized that in the early days of karate, the katas were not taught in a systematic way as they are today. Secondly, as a result of smaller numbers of students per instructor in the earlier days, it was common for the teachers to give more individual attention to each student. As a result, the teacher many times adjusted techniques to suit a particular students ability or physical stature. thirdly, students tended to stay with their teachers for a much longer period of time which further facilitated the individualization of technique. Lastly, the application of the martial art principle of "Shu-ha-ri" had an effect on the kata and technique. This principle not only applies to the techniques of karate but also the development of ones character.
The principle of Shu-ha-ri translates as follows:
o Shu - The student listens, obeys and learns from the teacher
(do as the teacher says)
o Ha - The students goal is to be better than the teacher
(perfect the technique)
o Ri - The completion of the process where the student via conscientious application of the first two concepts may actually become better than the teacher
(the student becomes the teacher)
It is therefore easy to see how the traditional teaching practices of turning a student into a teacher occurring prior and during a period of unprecedented growth in the popularity of the art, gave rise to the differences we observe today in the various traditional styles. However, even with the differences, traditional kata can be identified by the fact that they have a lineage to the early orthodox katas, each technique had a meaning, and the practitioner should be able to perform the techniques in an instinctive manner.
The Art of Karate has enjoyed a rather dynamic history both in Okinawa and Japan. The Art has has undergone constant evolution while maintaining its traditional values. The number of traditional styles in evidence today carry on their heritage through their katas. Their katas are the connection to the past - their lineage from the earlier orthodox styles. This is one of the key differences between traditional styles of karate-do and the myriad of "eclectic styles" popular today. Traditional Karate is an art with its foundation based on practical self-defense techniques. It is through the multiple levels of "Kata Bunkai" (interpretation of the movements in the katas form the base level to the advanced) and "Kakushide" (hidden techniques of the katas involving joint locking and nerve point techniques, etc.) that the self-defense teachings of the early Masters comes alive. Just as there is more to a "style" than "just a name", there is more to traditional karate than just doing the correct set of katas (although for too many individuals today call themselves by a specific traditional style name but do not do the katas of the system they claim membership and rank in). Traditional dojos can offer the serious student a connection to the knowledge of the early Masters in a way not available from the modern eclectic schools. The connection comes from the stability of teaching, availability of knowledge from style certified teachers, senior teachers and Style Masters who as in the case of the late Okinawa Kenpo Karate.
Another area which always seems to be a topic of discussion whenever more that two karate-kas get together is - Which style is the best? The best answer I ever heard to this was given by the late Master Robert A. Trias, the Father of American Karate and the founder / Director of the United States Karate Association. Master Trias stated at one of his seminars that "... there is no such thing as the best style of karate - there is only good karate and bad karate". In other words we can not hide behind a "style" as our excuse for doing poor karate from a technical viewpoint, as we all have a similar body structure and there are only certain ways to get the maximum out of our bodies. Each style may have certain techniques or teaching concepts it emphasizes, but the underlying principles of body movement are basically the same. An example of this point would be a simple front stance utilized in the Okinawan and Japanese styles. The Okinawan styles for the most part utilize a "Seisan Dachi" as their basic front stance, while the Japanese styles tend to use the longer "Zen Kutsu Dachi". Although the length of these two basic stances differs, both rely on the same technical concepts to achieve correct application. In point, the width of both stances is approximately shoulder width of the individual, both stances require the front foot to be slightly turned inward for correct bone alignment, both stances address the correct positioning of the hips before and after execution of a technique, the list could go on and on. In other words - good karate technique.
Traditional Karate teaches the practitioner to always be a student of the art, to adapt and to expand your knowledge , all while keeping the traditional values in tact. It is unfortunately something that is all to often left out of the programs of todays fast buck / quick rank programs. The bottom line is that traditional karate will not die out as it provides a valuable product in our modern society. Fifty of one hundred years from now, the names may have changed, but the values of the art will remain. These values include: honor; integrity; perfection of body, mind and spirit - in short, truly a worthwhile way of life.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

The language of our Art..



"Karate aims mentally to foster such heart as acts right in the sight of God and men, and technically to have such power as (to) bring any savage beast to one's knees. That is, Karate is perfect when both the mental and the technical is completed together."
Kise, Fusei - Shorinryu

It is commonly believed that karate has existed in Okinawa from ancient times, although there is no clear documentary evidence. One Japanese encylopedia, Sekai Dai - Hyakka - Jiten makes the strong conjecture that karate was probably introduced into Okinawa from China during the Tang dynasty (A.D. 618 - 906). One of the strongest supports for this claim, that karate is an innate part of ancient Okinawan culture, is based on observation of certain Ryukyuan classical dances. The parts danced by mail dancers resembles the modern karate movements. But, as it is not clear where or when these dances were created, there is by no means conclusive evidence. The written records are silent regarding the development of karate in Okinawa until near the end of the 14th century, or the Ming period. Not only is there an absence of written materials on the subject, but even oral traditions concerning the art are vague and generally lacking. In 1372 official Chinese-Okinawan relation were set up when king Satto of Okinawa expressed his loyalty to the Ming Emperor of China. With the Ryukyus now a Chinese satellite, a cultural conversion began in earnest. In the following centuries the Shaolin ch'uan fa (In Japanese Shorin - ji Kempo) found its way into the Ryukyus and developed into tote, the forerunner of present-day karate. In 1429 Okinawa became a unified kingdom under the famous hero-king Sho Hashi. Okinawa at first profited little from this unification. But this was soon to change. Because of his exposure to Chinese government officials, Sho Hashi learned a great deal about improving economic conditions in his kingdom. One of his first lessons involved the importance of active trade relations with other countries. Since the Ryukyuans had long been able sailors, they quite naturally fell into their newly appointed roles, as commercial sea traders.
Thus for the following two centuries the two large towns, Shuri and Naha, became famous as centers of an increasingly profitable traffic in luxury goods. The wares purchased in the Indies and the merchandise of Southeast Asia, were bought to Okinawa and reshipped to China, Korea and Japan. As a result, the Ryukyuans had widespread contact with the Arabs, Malays, Indonesians and Thai who frequented the centers of commerce. Of course, such contacts in itself is not enough to assure us of an exchange of ideas on Okinawan karate. But when we add two additional ingredients, bored and lonely seamen, and free flowing spirits, we do have an appropriate stage for a great deal of volatile cultural interaction. It is said, that karate like arts had been well developed in Indonesia, Malaya Thailand and other seaports in the South China Sea area. We therefore arrive at a picture of brawling sailors, performing a vivid, although undoubtedly bloody, exchange of ideas on weaponless fighting techniques. It is certain, that at this time Okinawans gained most, if not all, of their insight into the Southeast Asian forms of unarmed self-defense. In 1609 the Satsuma clan in Southern Kyushu, Japan, marched against the Ryukyus. The military expedition ended Okinawan independence and made way for complete Satsuma control over all the Ryukyu Islands. A number of prohibitive ordinances announced by the Satsuma clan included a ban on all weapons. Arms, found in an Okinawan's possession, were immediately confiscated and the owner or holder was severely punished. For this reason, the various Okinawan kempo groups and tote societies had a series of secret conferences. This resulted in their banding together as the united front against the enemy. The result was, that a new fighting style developed from this combination of tote and kempo (ch'uan fa), which was simply called te (hand). Te might be described as the intermediate stage between tote-ch'uan fa and modern karate.
During these early years of development, te practice was veiled in utmost secrecy due to the iron-clad Satsuma prohibitions. Although we find little information of karate activities, this was the period of the greatest development of Okinawan karate. It is almost impossible to tell, when the secrecy surrounding karate was relaxed. Several modern karate authorities claim, that intense seclusion of karate was maintained until about 1903. The supposition is difficult in view of the fact, that in 1875 Satsuma's “unofficial” occupation of the Ryukyus ended and Okinawa became officially a part of the Japanese Empire. In 1904 karate was officially introduced into the public schools in Okinawa, as a regular part of the physical education curriculum. Karate thus became a rather standard term by 1910 and remained so until new ideographs replaced the old around 1936.
Karate survived the destruction of World War II and emerged to become international in scope. From the ashes of war, karate regenerated and restrengthed itself, to take an equal position among the international sports, such as boxing, wrestling, judo and aikido. This is truly a remarkable achievement. At the beginning of this century, Okinawan karate became more or less standardized in various schools of ryu. The present-day schools of Okinawan karate-do are as follows:

1. Uechi Ryu
2. Ryuei Ryu
3. Kojo Ryu (Kongusuku Ryu)
4. Ishimine Ryu
5. Shito Ryu
a. Shito Ryu Kempo Branch
b. Shiroma-kei Shinto Ryu Branch
6. Goju Ryu
b. Kokusai Karate Kobudo Renmei Branch
c. Okinawa Goju Ryu Karate-do Kyokai Branch
d. Itokazu-kei Goju Ryu Karate Kobudo Kenkyu-kai Branch
7. Shorin Ryu
a. Matsubayashi Ryu Branch
b. Ishin Ryu Branch
c. Shorinji Ryu Branch
d. Chubu Shorin Ryu Branch
e. Ryukyu Shorin Ryu Branch
f. Motobu Ryu Branch
g. Kushin Ryu Branch
h. Matsumura Shorin Ryu Branch
1.) Matsumura Shorin Ryu Karate-do kyokai Sub-branch
2.) Shorin Ryu Matsumura Seito Okinawa Kobudo Kyokai Sub-branch
i. Okinawa Kempo Branch
1.) Okinawa Kempo Renmei Sub-branch
2.) Okinawa Kempo Karate Kyokai Sub-branch
j. Kobayashi Ryu Branch
1.) Kobayashi Ryu Shorin-kan Kyokai Sub-branch
2.) Kobayashi Ryu Kyudo-kan Shinkokai Sub-branch
3.) Kobayashi Ryu Karate-do Kyokai Sub-branch

Sunday, October 05, 2008

2009 Organizational Retreat & Symposium



2009 ORGANIZATIONAL RETREAT & SYMPOSIUM
April 17, 18 19
El Faro Hotel in Aguadilla, Western Puerto Rico
lets you experience true tropical settings and nature. Aguadilla, founded in 1775, is one of the most picturesque towns in Puerto Rico.
World Sansei Koryu Gojuryu Karate & Kobudo Organization
First Organizational Symposium in Puerto Rico

Friday, April 17 Saturday April 18 Sunday April 19
Under the working title:
“World Sansei Traditional Karate Training And Philosophy”


The main idea of Symposium is to attract worldwide members to gather in one place to plan out and discuss the future of World Sansei.
To improve theory as well as practice of karate training.
We truly hope that this may bring new era to development of our organization.

Symposium Program
Friday welcoming gathering

Saturday
8:45- 9:15 Registration (may be in advance)
9:30 Welcoming Remarks and Greetings
9:35-10:00 Speaker 1
10:00-10:30 Speaker 2
10:30-11:00 Speaker 3
11:00-11:30 Speaker 4
11:30-12:00 Speaker 5
12:30- 1:00 Break
1:00- 1:30 Speaker 6
1:30- 2:00 Speaker 7
2:30- 2:30 Speaker 8
3:00- 4:30 Round Table Discussion
4:30 Closing Remarks

We will provide adequate space with audio-visual equipment that will
have possibility of PowerPoint presentation and projections. Anticipated number of participants is 150.
Lunch will be provided on site.
Accepted presentations will be published prior to Symposium and given to participants as a part of Symposium package:
*Certificate of Participation
*Symposium Publication/Manual
*ORGANIZATIONAL PASSPORTS TO ALL MEMBERS

Theme:
“Sport Karate Influences on (understanding of) Traditional Karate
Training”
Karate training:
1. Methodology of training
2. Physiology of training
3. Psychology of training

Aspect of training: Methodology of karate training with further reference to specific sub-aspects of Kihon, Kata and Kumite.
Relation between “Karate” and “Sport of Karate” is probably the most attractive and the most controversial…We may have some submissions that
will have potential impact on perception of sport and competition.
Works that cover Physiology and Psychology of training will be discussed qualified MD’s or Psychologists that are specifically researching Karate will be there. We will discuss Organizational regions and organizational marketing. We will also be discussing organizational web sites
Be looking out for more information soon.”
Sunday organizational farewell breakfast